Is Rivian Autonomy+ Worth $50 a Month Right Now? Probably Not for Most People

Rivian Autonomy+

Starting April 4th, Gen 2 R1 owners who opted into Rivian’s Autonomy+ subscription are going to see that $49.99 charge hit their account for the first time, and a lot of people are already asking the same question: is this actually worth it?

Right now, the honest answer for most owners is probably no, and that’s not a knock on Rivian. It’s just the reality of where the feature set is today.

For $49.99 a month (or a $2,500 one-time payment), you currently get two things. Universal Hands-Free, which enables hands-free assisted driving across over 3.5 million roads in the US and Canada, and Lane Change on Command, which lets you tap the turn signal and have the truck or SUV find a gap and move over on its own. That’s it. That’s the whole package as of today.

The features that actually make Autonomy+ sound compelling aren’t here yet. Auto Parking and On-Ramp to Off-Ramp support, which would let you merge onto a highway and have the vehicle follow your route through interchanges until you exit, are both slated for later in 2026. No firm dates, just “later.”

The harder sell is that Rivian already includes Highway Assist for free. It’s a capable adaptive cruise control system that handles highway driving well and comes standard on Gen 2 vehicles, you just have to keep your hands on the wheel. So the main thing Autonomy+ is really adding today is the ability to go hands-free on those 3.5 million roads, plus lane changes without touching the wheel. That’s a real differentiator, but for a lot of owners it may not be a $600-a-year differentiator.

Universal Hands-Free

When you stack that price against two features, with the more interesting ones still months away, a lot of owners are going to do the math and sit it out for now. And honestly, I think that’s fair. My take is that Rivian should have kept Autonomy+ free until the feature set was actually fleshed out. Two features is a hard thing to charge for, and asking owners to pay now, before On-Ramp to Off-Ramp or Auto Parking are even available, feels premature. Let the subscription earn its price tag first.

That calculus is going to hurt Rivian in a way that doesn’t show up on a subscription revenue line. The company’s autonomy roadmap leans heavily on real-world data collection, and every vehicle that opts out of Autonomy+ is a vehicle that’s not contributing to that feedback loop at the same level. Rivian needs miles and edge cases and varied driving scenarios to improve the system, and a low adoption rate early on could slow that down in ways that compound over time.

It’s a tough spot, and one that feels a little self-inflicted. The features that would justify the price aren’t ready, but Rivian needs people paying and driving the system to get those features ready. Hopefully the On-Ramp to Off-Ramp rollout later this year gives fence-sitters a reason to reconsider, because right now Autonomy+ is asking you to pay for a promise as much as a product.

24 Comments

  1. I feel your opinion is kinda negative here. my question to you is.how did Rivian clock up 3.5 + million miles to this point i feel rivian will be moving forward one or a nother i think some will have no problem paying this as when things are added the fees will go up so it’s a good resell thing

    • I think Jose gave a pretty honest opinion. His job is not to be a Rivian cheerleader but to try and give us accurate information. If anything, I think he errors too much on the side of pro-Rivian (sorry Jose, nothing personal) than anti.

      • I respect this comment more than you know! Rivian doesn’t pay me but I’m a huge advocate of the company. That being said, they’re not perfect and I don’t agree with a lot they do so that’s where my opinion comes in.

  2. Pay for a promise as much as a product? Why does that sound familiar? Maybe they’re copying their competitor toooo much.

  3. $600/year for the features they are offering right now is not too much to ask for. And like you said, they need the data as well. Why the negativity. It feels like Rivian is under the microscope so often for every little thing, my god. Meanwhile, Toyota engines are grenading everywhere and many other legacy car makers have huge recalls and problems—but those go unnoticed and they get a pass.

  4. I don’t find this negative at all, just seems like he’s being a realist. It is laughable to have to pay 50 a month for 2 features only. Add more and then for sure but at this time he is head on nail with his thoughts.

  5. Do you think Rivian will increase the cost once the fully autonomous features come out?

  6. I would pay 99 a month for FSD.. I just wonder if we get it before end of year. I have a feeling R2 is now a priority and us R1 people are going to get left behind.

  7. I think Jose is on target with this article. Rivian will get some revenues now – which they need – but will miss out on data collection. For now, I’ll be siting out.

    I don’t feel left behind. My R1 is more capable than when I bought it in 2024. That never happened before.

  8. $50 a month doesn’t make sense, but $2500 for lifetime absolutely does if you are planning on keeping your vehicle for another 4 years minimum.

    You get full access to the future system, AND it becomes an asset of the vehicle, meaning it increases its value (even if it’s only $500 or so).

    I went ahead with lifetime and don’t regret it.

  9. I agree with you Jose. I’ve been on the fence about it. I’ll probably let the free trial lapse, and if I miss it after a month I’ll just pay the one time fee. I’d really like to see more autonomy by the end of the year to feel like I’m getting the value though. In the meantime I’d feel like I’m doing Rivian a favor and contributing data and money, which is okay.

  10. If you are Gen2, wouldn’t paying the 2.5k upfront be the wisest option (if not leasing). Get the incremental benefits now and improvements over the year culminating in point to point?

    • But I’d like to point out that point-to-point is only a promise at this point.
      I’d pay $2,500 now if I was guaranteed point-to-point and a 50% refund if it doesn’t arrive.

  11. It’s not even worth the $50 until point to point is released. I absolutely won’t be paying the $50/mo. I didn’t realize they were this far behind Tesla. Also why are they taking so long and being so inconsistent with software releases in general? I’ve been trying to patiently wait for the next update to see what features it brings.

  12. Based on Rivian’s history of over-promising and under-delivering I would be very hesitant to pat the full $2,500 for this. As a G1 R1S owner I have basically no confidence that Rivian will do what they promise. My expectation is that sometime middle to later this year we will hear that actually all the new autonomy features are only going to be available on G3 hardware.

  13. 1) Jose presented a balanced viewpoint. I suspect he is correct that many R1 owners won’t sign on to Autonomy+ immediately.

    2) I will be signing up for the $2500 one-time subscription. I’m one year into a a three year lease and fully expect to buy out at the end. I will freely admit that I love this truck and the idea of a software defined vehicle that improves over time. I’ve been following Rivian developments since the purchased the empty Mitsubishi plant in Normal and I’m enjoying the journey!

    3) I am constantly amazed by people’s perception of costs. Sure, you purchased an expensive vehicle from a startup company but do you think that one purchase funded software development for the life of the vehicle?

    • > do you think that one purchase funded software development for the life of the vehicle?
      Yes.

      Do you think my $108k is $2500 short of funding software development for the life of the vehicle?

      • I guess the other side of that questions is “do you think that Rivian guaranteed you point-to-point autonomy when you purchased your vehicle?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *