The Companies That Cut EV Plans Want Chinese EVs Banned

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which lobbies for GM, Toyota, Volkswagen and nearly every other major automaker, is pushing Congress to pass a permanent ban on Chinese vehicles when lawmakers come back next week, Reuters reported. I think that’s the wrong call, and I’d rather see imports allowed with the tariffs brought down.

The bill has momentum. It cleared a Senate committee in July and the House version has more than 100 co-sponsors, even though a Biden-era rule already keeps Chinese automakers out and their EVs face tariffs above 100%.

The data concern is fair, since cars know a lot about where we go. Washington can require any automaker selling here to keep American driver data in the US and open its software to inspection, and that would handle the risk without a permanent ban.

Then there’s who’s asking. Ford announced a $19.5 billion writedown last December as it scaled back its EV programs and GM booked $7.6 billion in EV charges in the back half of 2025, and both are Alliance members. Rivian and Tesla aren’t members, and RJ Scaringe has said the industry should plan on Chinese EVs arriving because “the technology is much better.”

Alliance CEO John Bozzella pointed to Europe, where the EU imported more than 1.1 million Chinese vehicles in the first eight months of 2026. European buyers get to shop BYD and Zeekr alongside VW and Renault, and BYD’s European sales jumped 80%to 178,000 in the first half of 2026.

A permanent ban would lock in today’s prices and today’s lineups for years, and that’s a bad deal for anyone shopping for an EV, including the folks waiting on R2. Competition is how this market gets cheaper and better.

author avatar
Jose Castillo Founder and Editor
Jose Castillo is the founder of RivianTrackr and has owned and driven Rivians since early in the brand's consumer history. He currently drives an R1S and an R2 in Florida and uses Universal Hands-Free every day. As a credentialed Rivian journalist, he has covered the R2 First Drive in Park City and SXSW firsthand and has spoken directly with Rivian's software and autonomy leadership.
Add RivianTrackr as a preferred source on Google

Share this story

6 Comments

  1. Can’t agree with you on this one, Jose.
    If you think we have too many concerns about privacy now, just wait if/when the CCP backed auto companies are allowed to be sold in the USA. FAIR Competition is good for the consumer. CCP backed autos should never be considered as fair competition. Who knows how many innovations the CCP stole from USA (or any other country) through espionage. There are plenty of EV choices made in the USA and other non-CCP nations and there are going to be many more in the next few years. VW in Europe could cease to exist if the Europeans keep allowing CCP backed auto to be sold in the EU.

    • China already knows where we go. Remember when there was a bipartisan push to ban tiktok before last election? Once the votes were in, nobody cared anymore. True capitalism breeds on competition. The US is behind on several aspects of education, technology, and infrastructure, because we decided to close our borders to enrich the EXISTING monopolies and not focus on the good of the consumer. Capitalism = great. Late-stage capitalism = 💩

  2. Let them. Rivian and Tesla will dominate EVs in the US while lackluster OEMs keep waiting and destroying the environment. Until we have actual regulations for emissions and incentives again, it’s a nonstarter.

  3. I think it’s more about product dumping than privacy. How can US companies compete with Chinese cost of labor and heavy government subsidies? We can’t. Great article in the WSJ about the overstock of Chinese EVs right now, looking for a place to be dumped. Unless RJ and Elon start building cars with robots that don’t need health insurance, we can’t compete.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *